The Data Response that we were assessed on this week was the very first in our IB economics careers. The lack of experience was blatantly exposed as many of us failed to produce an adequate or appropriate evaluation. I made several mistakes, many of which could be remedied through simple practice and experience.
Although I felt that for the very first evaluation of the year I wrote a fair response to the article that was provided, I excluded several crucial components which could have significantly escalated the quality and effectiveness of my evaluation.
First of all, the response did not explicitly state the type of good “real ale” could be categorized by. Although elasticity and the shape/behavior of the demand curve of real ale was discussed, the response did not include a conclusive breakdown on whether real aleĀ is a normal, inferior, or ostentatious good. This categorization will surely solidify the points and discussions of the evaluation, and show more credentials on the arguments that were brought up in the response.
Also I neglected to consider the current economic situation in the response, and therefore completely ignored/went around the reason of the shift in demand for real ale. I drew an assumption that the shift in demand was caused by an indeterminant change in the consumer preferences. The current economic crisis is an obvious factor and cause of problems and quandaries to businesses and markets all around the world, not restricted to pubs and beer. This simple connection between the global economic problem and this (relatively) local economic problem would have significantly contributed to the sense of purpose in the response. This article regarding the problems of English pubs illustrate the problems of businesses everywhere around the world. A simple reference to this connection would have made my response seem more intelligent/purposeful.
Although many weaknesses and shortcoming were spotted after the return of my data response assessment, I will strive to correct and improve upon my skills in evaluating and analyzing data response assignments. Many of these shortcomings include both the inaptitude in our knowledge in the subject of economics, as well as inexperience in our practice in these types of assessments. And so hopefully, practice and experience reaps a better composed response/evaluation (and therefore a better score) in the future for both myself and the rest of the IB economics class.
